![]() ![]() Fewer participants of the mechanical traction group had signs of neurological impairment, mainly finger numbness, at five weeks but this difference was not statistically significant by one year.Ĭomparisons of methods used in adults to put bone fragments of a fractured wrist back into place Both methods yielded similar radiological results. ![]() ![]() Less pain during the reduction procedure was recorded for the mechanical traction group. The third study compared mechanical reduction involving a special device without anaesthesia versus manual reduction under haematoma block (local anaesthesia). No differences in anatomical outcome were detected. While participants of the novel method group suffered more, yet not intolerable, pain during the reduction procedure, the latter was shorter in duration. One trial compared a novel method of manual reduction where the non‐anaesthetised patient actively provided counter‐traction versus traditional manual reduction under intravenous regional anaesthesia. All participants of this trial were given intravenous regional anaesthesia. One trial found no statistically significant differences between mechanical reduction using finger trap traction and manual reduction in anatomical outcomes. These failed to assess functional outcome, and only one trial reported on complications. Three trials involving a total of 404, mainly female and older, people with displaced fractures of the distal radius were included. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |